I’m trying to figure out if Grammarly can detect AI-generated text. My professor asked us to make sure our essays are original and not written by AI, so I’m wondering if Grammarly offers any tool or feature for AI detection. Anyone know how reliable it is or if there are alternatives?
Short answer: No, Grammarly doesn’t have any built-in AI detector. Long answer: Grammarly’s jam is grammar, spelling, tone, and sometimes plagiarism (only with the premium version). But spotting whether a text was written by AI, like ChatGPT or something similar? Nope, not on their feature list (for now, at least, though who knows what they’ll add next year).
If your professor’s on high alert about AI writing, you’re looking for something totally different. There are sites like GPTZero, Turnitin (if your school uses it), or other standalone “AI detection” tools…but honestly, they’re all pretty hit-or-miss right now. AI detectors can sometimes flag regular student writing, or even miss clearly AI-generated stuff. It’s not a perfect science yet (more like a coin toss).
If you wanna be super sure your work isn’t pinged as “too robotic,” you might wanna check out this AI text humanizer to bypass AI detectors. That’s specifically designed to make AI-generated content sound more human, if that’s something you’re curious about (not saying you should cheat, just saying the tool exists).
Bottom line: Grammarly = NOT an AI detector. You’ll need a dedicated tool for that job, and even those aren’t foolproof. If you’re writing your own stuff, you’re already ahead of the game.
2 Likes
Nope, Grammarly definitely does not have any AI detection built in—@viajantedoceu nailed it (even if I think those humanizer tools sound a bit sketch). Grammarly sticks to grammar, clarity, tone, and (if you shell out some $$$) plagiarism, but it’s not checking for whether your work was written by you or the bot next door. They might add that someday, who knows, but for now, nada.
Here’s my two cents: AI detectors (even fancy ones like Turnitin’s new stuff or GPTZero) are far from reliable. Plenty of stories about legit student essays getting hit with false positives, or really obvious ChatGPT blurbs sneaking right through. So, honestly, you’re in a weird spot if your prof’s super worried about AI. It’s a wild west out here—there isn’t a foolproof method right now.
If your main concern is just making your work not sound robotic-bland (even if it’s genuinely yours), focusing on voice, idioms, and throwing in some personal quirks does wonders. No AI detector can sniff out your weird analogies, sarcasm, or oddly specific observations—not yet, anyway. But if you are playing with AI text and trying to disguise it, tools like Clever AI Humanizer are probably smoother and safer than pasting into a million free online detectors; some of those even harvest your data. Caveat emptor.
Anyway, unless you’re trying to slip AI stuff past the goalie, just write your own thoughts and you’ll be fine. Everyone’s so nervous about AI right now, but honestly, as long as you’re putting some of yourself into it, you’re golden.
If you want some extra insight into how others tweak AI text to sound more human, check out these easy-to-follow Reddit user tips on making AI-writing undetectable. They’ve got some practical, non-obvious advice that doesn’t rely on expensive software or sketchy tricks.
Here’s what a lot of folks miss: your professor isn’t just worried about “plagiarism” in the old-school sense—they’re concerned your work might sound like it rolled straight off an assembly line at ChatGPT HQ. Grammarly, as explained, is all about grammar help and typo-spotting, but won’t help you out with the AI detection challenge. The previous replies covered that base.
Let’s get into the nitty-gritty: dedicated detectors (think GPTZero, Turnitin’s AI checker, etc.) are famously inconsistent—sometimes they trip on their own shoelaces. That said, what these tools stub their algorithmic toes on is overly polished or generic text with flat tone and formulaic argument structure. Give them highly personal, specific, or stylistically funky writing? Suddenly their magic “AI radar” gets real fuzzy.
If you’re looking to “humanize” your text—maybe you’ve got drafty passages that feel too synthetic, even if you did write them—something like Clever AI Humanizer could be useful. Pro: It goes beyond basic synonym-swapping, actually reworking sentences for tone and style; plus, it tries to preserve your original ideas while smoothing robotic edges. Con: Still, no tool guarantees your work will completely avoid detection if your prof runs it through a dozen detectors, and subtle stylistic choices can get lost in the processing shuffle.
Compare with competitors—like the stuff mentioned already—Clever AI Humanizer seems less likely to overload your essay with awkward phrasing or obvious “spintax” weirdness. It’s more effective at mimicking natural flow. Downside? Sometimes it takes a heavy hand and strips a bit too much personality out if you’re not careful, so always reread and tweak manually.
Hot tip: If you want to avoid even needing these tools in the first place, sprinkle in anecdotes from your actual life, reference specific local or class content, and use word choices that aren’t standard textbook fare. Detectors struggle big time with quirky or distinctly you moments.
In short: Grammarly stays in its own lane, so think beyond it. And if you do use something like Clever AI Humanizer, make sure it’s just a springboard, not a substitute for your own voice.